Re: Egypt 'hijacked Vodafone network'

[Marshall Eubanks <tme () americafree tv>]

On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:20 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Scott Brim <scott.brim () gmail com> wrote:
> > On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > > On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of
> > > > using its network to send pro-government text messages.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12357694
> > >
> > > Here is their PR
> > >
> > > http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/press.html
> > >
> > > Note that this is entirely legal, under "the emergency powers
> > > provisions of the Telecoms Act"
> >
> > Which is legal, Vodafone's protest or the government's telling them to
> > send messages?  afaik the agreement was that the operator would have
> > preloaded canned messages, agreed on in advance with the government, and
> > now the government is telling them to send out arbitrary messages they
> > compose on the spot.
>
> I wonder if these messages were blockable by the end-user or if they were being sent as a service announcement from 
> Vodafone.
>
> Certainly, if the government were sending the messages under the company name then something sounds wrong about that.
>
> What I would like is to hear from someone who received the messages and what their experiences were.

They were described to me as being "from Vodafone." I assumed that this meant that they were service messages. 

Marshall

> Andrew