nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:28:32 -0500
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:41:26 EST, Matthew Huff said:
Owen, can you point to a application protocol that is broken via NAT that isn't a p2p protocol or VoIP?
The only reason FTP works through a NAT is because the NAT has already been hacked up to further mangle the data stream to make up for the mangling it does. I'm told that IPSEC through a NAT can be interesting too... And that's something I'm also told some corporations are interested in.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Simon Perreault (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)