nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:12:55 -0800


On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:00 AM, Jack Bates wrote:



On 2/2/2011 8:38 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:

From the main section on https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html:

"...  ISPs with both IPv4 resources and IPv6 resources pay the larger of the two fees."

It is not mentioned anywhere in the waiver stuff.


The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most 
ISPs find themselves 1 rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively doubles your price anyways. :)


Jack

Actually, so far, most ISPs are finding themselves one rank lower.

The exception is particularly small providers and there is a combination of suggestion (about fees) and policy 
(Proposal 121) effort underway to rectify that problem.

Owen



Current thread: