nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....

From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 04:19:50 +0000

On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:05 PM, George Herbert wrote:


More interesting would be re-requests - organizations exhausting an
initial allocation and requiring more.  People asking for the first
one just indicates initial adoption rates.

Other than experimental blocks, I am generally under the impression
that IPv6 allocations are designed to avoid that being necessary for
an extended period of time.  If that is not true, then that's a flag.


I don't believe we've had an IPv6 "additional" request yet (but I look
forward to it happening at some point :-).  I will check and get back
to the list with the definitive answer.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

Current thread:

Re: quietly...., (continued)
- - - Re: quietly.... Martin Millnert (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
    - RE: quietly.... Lee Howard (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Randy Bush (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Kevin Stange (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... George Herbert (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Skeeve Stevens (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Christopher Morrow (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... John Curran (Feb 01)
    - Re: quietly.... Geoff Huston (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Matthew Petach (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Rene Wilhelm (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Geoff Huston (Feb 01)

(Thread continues...)