nanog mailing list archives
RE: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
From: "-Hammer-" <bhmccie () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:06:49 -0600
AT&T has told us that they will have IPv6 on their MIS circuits Q2 2011. Deltacom has told us the same. We will be testing native IPv6 with both these carriers on GE Internet circuits sometime around Q3. -Hammer- "I was a normal American nerd." -Jack Herer -----Original Message----- From: Jack Carrozzo [mailto:jack () crepinc com] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 9:01 PM To: Eric Van Tol Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection We pick up v6 from HE currently (like the rest of the world). L3 offered us dual stack also, but they wanted money to set it up plus MRC. None of our Bits That Matter (tm) go over v6 anyhow. (I guess the right phrase would be "revenue producing bits"). -Jack Carrozzo On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Eric Van Tol <eric () atlantech net> wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared () puck nether net] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:49 PM To: Jack Carrozzo Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 plans/networks/customer ports enabled. I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences. What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?We don't see Savvis, Level3, or AboveNet with IPv6 capabilities in our region (DC). Two years ago, neither Verizon or AT&T had IPv6, either.
Not
sure about them now, as we no longer use them for transit. One would
think
everyone would have v6 capabilities in the heart of government territory, but okay. For whatever reason, Verio actually charges (or used to) for their IPv6 separately from IPv4 and to top it all off, it wasn't significantly discounted. -evt
Current thread:
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (Feb 17)
- RE: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection -Hammer- (Feb 17)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Feb 19)