nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speed Test Results
From: Sean Harlow <sean () seanharlow info>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:06:56 -0500
Basically it's a CYA statement on the part of Ookla/speedtest.net, since their test sites are of varying quality. The Radnor, OH test site sometimes can't even properly test a 10mbit SOHO broadband connection, where the Toledo site is consistently able to flood every available bit of capacity on my 50/5 home connection. It's just another tool that needs to be used intelligently. If I'm testing out a new ISP or a new speed level I've never had before, I wouldn't immediately complain if I didn't get the expected result on a public speed test site as it may be something outside of my ISP's control. On the other hand if things start dragging on my home connection or anywhere else that I know I can expect a certain result speedtest.net is usually my first stop. ---------- Sean Harlow sean () seanharlow info On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:43 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
Even though the faq's say they are only good for residential usage, i have had no problems with it at school. My college has 2x 100 Mb circuits from TW. When i run speed tests (I use speedtest.net) with the campus empty, i can get around 95Mb up. The bottleneck is the school's 100Mb switches. When the campus is filled (during the week) i can normally get close to 40 Mb down on a test. -Grant
Current thread:
- Re: Speed Test Results, (continued)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 28)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel jaeggli (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Michael Holstein (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Graham Beneke (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joe Hamelin (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Frank Bulk (Dec 25)
- RE: Speed Test Results Scott Berkman (Dec 25)
- Re: Speed Test Results Grant Ridder (Dec 25)
- Re: Speed Test Results Sean Harlow (Dec 25)
- Re: Speed Test Results Graham Beneke (Dec 23)