nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP addresses are now assets
From: joshua sahala <jsahala () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 12:37:29 -0700
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:20 PM, John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:[cut]
Your subject line (IP addresses are now assets) could mislead folks,
[cut] ianal, but the treatment of ip addresses by the bankruptcy court would tend to agree with the definition of an asset from webster's new world law dictionary (http://law.yourdictionary.com/asset): Any property or right that is owned by a person or entity and has monetary value. See also liability. All of the property of a person or entity or its total value; entries on a balance sheet listing such property. intangible asset An asset that is not a physical thing and only evidenced by a written document. the addresses are being exchanged for money, in order to pay a debt...how is this not a sale of an asset?
ARIN holds that IP address space is not property but is managed as a> public resource.
imho, if it were truly a 'public resource' and managed as such, it would be returned to the appropriate rir for reassignment, rather than being auctioned off to the highest bidder by a (commodities) broker...administrative and processing fees are one thing, but this is pure commoditisation of a so-called 'public resource' by speculators. i am, unfortunately, in the minority on this topic On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:33 AM, John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote: [cut]
"Sale may be subject to compliance with certain requirements of the American Registry of Internet Numbers ("ARIN") and the court materials to date reflect this.
MAY versus WILL -- rfc2119 contains a pretty clear definition of each, which i am pretty sure echoes legal precedent..but again, ianal, so, ymmv, etc, etc the speculative market exists and is growing, why do certain factions of the community keep trying to pretend that it doesn't? /joshua
Current thread:
- Re: IP addresses are now assets, (continued)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Gary Buhrmaster (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Joly MacFie (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- RE: IP addresses are now assets Leigh Porter (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Martin Hannigan (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets joshua sahala (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Ricky Beam (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Henry Yen (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Mike Jones (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Joe Loiacono (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Leo Bicknell (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets joshua sahala (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets John Curran (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Owen DeLong (Dec 02)
- Re: IP addresses are now assets Jay Ashworth (Dec 02)