nanog mailing list archives
Re: local_preference for transit traffic?
From: Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:27:48 -0500
2011/12/15 Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:42:37 PM Leo Bicknell wrote:However, there may be a simpler explanation. If you bill by the bit as a transit provider it's in your best interest to make sure your customer gets as many bits through you as possible. Plus if you can fill their pipe, they need to buy an upgrade to you.Indeed. Forgive my ignorance, but are connections between ISP's normally billed by
the bit? I'm a transit AS but not an ISP in the traditional sense, so I just have the normal monthly billing.
Current thread:
- local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 14)
- RE: local_preference for transit traffic? Holmes,David A (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Leo Bicknell (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 14)
- RE: local_preference for transit traffic? Holmes,David A (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 17)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Matthew Petach (Dec 17)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Adam Rothschild (Dec 17)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 18)