nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy.
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:45:11 -0800
On Dec 14, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Just fyi, de-bogoning , or private rfc 1918 is not really an option even with strong and consistent demonstrate load. Any suggestions on how to navigate this policy ?
Given unmet demand, I'd think the solution would be fairly obvious (albeit likely quite expensive with the going rate being around $12/address). I'd guess some of the folks who would be more than happy to help you (in exchange for a transaction fee of course) will contact you in the near future (if they haven't already). Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Cameron Byrne (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Rubens Kuhl (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Andrew D Kirch (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Robert E. Seastrom (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. David Conrad (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jimmy Hess (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Joel jaeggli (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. David Conrad (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jimmy Hess (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jared Mauch (Dec 14)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Matthew Kaufman (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Matthew Kaufman (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Jimmy Hess (Dec 15)
- Re: De-bogon not possible via arin policy. Rubens Kuhl (Dec 14)