nanog mailing list archives
RE: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship
From: "O'Reirdan, Michael" <Michael_OReirdan () Cable Comcast com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:36:59 +0000
MAAWG has written voicing its concerns on SOPA and PIPA. http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_US_Congress_S968-HR3261_Comments_2011-12.pdf Mike ________________________________________ From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [ops.lists () gmail com] Sent: 14 December 2011 05:12 To: Hal Murray Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others. If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with something, other operators could sign on to that as well. The EFF petition has way too much propaganda and far less content than would be entirely productive in a policy discussion. --srs On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray () megapathdsl net> wrote:
Security and Other Technical Concerns Raised by the DNS Filtering Requirements in the PROTECT IP Bill Authors: Steve Crocker, Shinkuro, Inc. David Dagon, Georgia Tech Dan Kaminsky, DKH Danny McPherson, Verisign, Inc. Paul Vixie, Internet Systems Consortium
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship Hal Murray (Dec 13)
- Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 14)
- RE: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship O'Reirdan, Michael (Dec 14)
- Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 14)
- RE: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship O'Reirdan, Michael (Dec 14)
- Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against censorship Suresh Ramasubramanian (Dec 14)