nanog mailing list archives

Previous By Date Next
Previous By Thread Next

RE: Inaccessible network from Verizon, accessible elsewhere.

From: Brandon Kim <brandon.kim () brandontek com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:02:25 -0500

Yes I am in Rockland. I failed to mentioned that I was having issues with consumer FIOS.

Is anyone with Verizon on this list? This morning www.cisco.com and www.nfl.com works now.
They didn't last night.

There are still some websites that won't load or slow to load....






From: mhuff () ox com
To: maillist () webjogger net; nanog () nanog org
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:44:56 -0500
Subject: RE: Inaccessible network from Verizon, accessible elsewhere.

DSLReports Verizon forum reports routing issues in Westchester, Rockland and Nassau. I tried a few traceroutes this 
morning. Some went through fine, others died at the first hop within Verizon.

People are reporting mixed results calling Verizon. Some techs are saying it's a known issues, others are going 
through the standard script (reboot router, reboot ONT, check settings on browser, i.e. clueless, even to the point 
of saying that the person's router is bad and they would send them a new one).



----
Matthew Huff             | 1 Manhattanville Rd
Director of Operations   | Purchase, NY 10577
OTA Management LLC       | Phone: 914-460-4039
aim: matthewbhuff        | Fax:   914-460-4139


-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Greene [mailto:maillist () webjogger net]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:27 AM
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Inaccessible network from Verizon, accessible elsewhere.

We're having strange issues in NYC metropolitan area.

We can trace from Verizon FIOS to some IP addresses of our ASN 11579
block. Others don't work. The IP's that don't work seem to die at
130.81.107.228 on the Verizon network.

Something is rotten in Denmark. Or NY. You know what I mean.

On 12/12/2011 1:02 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Huff<mhuff () ox com>  wrote:

Consumer fios. Verizon forums are full of posts about it. Too tired

this evening to worry about it.

:( I'll have to do some testing when I get near a consumer fios
then... So, they squash all DNS NOT to their complexes, that seems
rather dastardly of them... considering they deployed that hateful
paxfire/nominum garbage on their recursive servers :(

-chris


On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:48 PM, "Christopher

Morrow"<morrowc.lists () gmail com>  wrote:



On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Matthew Huff<mhuff () ox com>

wrote:

I'm seeing the same thing from my home lan via fios. I've run a

recursive dns server for years and can't reach the roots. Had to switch
to using verizon's dns servers as forwarders.



business or consumer fios?
3  G0-9-4-7.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.104.180)  6.662

ms

6.739 ms  6.788 ms
4  so-14-0-0-0.RES-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net (130.81.22.56)  6.852 ms
15.384 ms  8.184 ms
5  0.ae2.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (152.63.32.158)  12.857 ms  12.927 ms
13.004 ms
6  dcp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net (63.146.26.105)  12.429 ms  7.847 ms
6.464 ms
7  lap-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net (67.14.22.78)  89.140 ms  88.929 ms
89.032 ms
8  63.146.26.70 (63.146.26.70)  94.879 ms  94.580 ms  93.120 ms
9  sl-crs1-kc-0-0-0-2.sprintlink.net (144.232.18.112)  58.520 ms
58.330 ms  58.186 ms
10  144.232.25.193 (144.232.25.193)  49.950 ms
sl-crs1-oma-0-9-2-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.2.177)  49.962 ms
sl-crs1-oma-0-8-0-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.8.171)  47.687 ms
11  sl-crs1-oro-0-3-3-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.25.207)  84.416 ms
83.266 ms sl-crs1-oro-0-12-3-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.25.73)
84.667 ms
12  124.215.199.122 (124.215.199.122)  195.590 ms * *

all of this seems to point at some kddi.net rouer gobbling packets,
no? (since pretty much everyone's got the same terminating hop) -
also note that while some folks traverse L3, my route is via

qwest...


it's interesting that 701 isn't picking their other peer (sprint)
here directly, no?


Sent from my iPad

On Dec 11, 2011, at 8:07 PM, "Brandon

Kim"<brandon.kim () brandontek com>  wrote:



I too am now experiencing issues. I cannot get to www.cisco.com

and various websites.

Some websites work lightning quick, some take a long time to

load, and some just don't load at all.....






Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:55:40 +0900
From: randy () psg com
To: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: Inaccessible network from Verizon, accessible

elsewhere.


from home lan

% traceroute gw-li377.linode.com
traceroute to gw-li377.linode.com (106.187.34.1), 64 hops max,

52

byte packets
1  192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1)  1.471 ms  0.725 ms  0.555 ms
2  tokyo10-f03.flets.2iij.net (210.149.34.72)  7.241 ms  6.651

ms

6.939 ms
3  tokyo10-ntteast0.flets.2iij.net (210.149.34.157)  5.573 ms
6.109 ms  5.346 ms
4  tky001lip20.iij.net (210.149.34.97)  6.410 ms  7.471 ms

7.934

ms
5  tky001bb10.iij.net (58.138.100.209)  6.670 ms  9.251 ms

5.866

ms
6  tky009bf00.iij.net (58.138.80.17)  6.730 ms
    tky008bf02.iij.net (58.138.80.13)  7.021 ms
    tky009bf00.iij.net (58.138.80.17)  8.593 ms
7  tky001ix05.iij.net (58.138.82.2)  9.767 ms
    tky001ix05.iij.net (58.138.82.6)  6.101 ms
    tky001ix01.iij.net (58.138.80.106)  8.420 ms
8  203.181.102.61 (203.181.102.61)  19.514 ms
    203.181.102.21 (203.181.102.21)  6.054 ms
    203.181.102.61 (203.181.102.61)  11.478 ms
9  otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (118.155.197.129)  7.457 ms
    otejbb203.kddnet.ad.jp (59.128.7.129)  7.835 ms
    otejbb204.kddnet.ad.jp (59.128.7.130)  7.824 ms
10  cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.180)  15.860 ms  16.401

ms

    cm-fcu203.kddnet.ad.jp (124.215.194.164)  17.519 ms
11  124.215.199.122 (124.215.199.122)  7.892 ms *  11.984 ms
Previous By Date Next
Previous By Thread Next

Current thread: