nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 22:52:09 -0400
On Aug 27, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 13:56:35 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:And the customers still don't care. They just care _that_ it affected them - at least during the problem. Although one can hope they care enough to change their behavior afterward.And yet, people still single-home to Tier-1s. Go figure.
People still single home to "tier-2s" that have a single transit provider - which is objectively worse. People still smoke too. Go figure. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines, (continued)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Niclas Comstedt (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Joly MacFie (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W . Gilmore (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Seth Mattinen (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 27)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 19)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Leo Bicknell (Aug 28)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 28)
- Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines Adam Rothschild (Aug 27)