nanog mailing list archives
Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:30:12 +0530
I did ask him to try it and see if it works .. when it doesn't work, that'd be the next act in this little dog and pony show. On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:11 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
The Spamhaus reports appear credible, as does the RIPE registration issue with those prefixes. If I was InterNAP, I think I'd challenge my customer about them. Start of business Monday morning.
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- RE: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap, (continued)
- RE: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Erik Bais (Aug 21)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Denis Spirin (Aug 21)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Randy (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Adrian (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Denis Spirin (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Denis Spirin (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap William Herrin (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 20)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Adrian (Aug 20)
- Message not available
- Fwd: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Denis Spirin (Aug 21)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Denis Spirin (Aug 28)
- Re: Prefix hijacking by Michael Lindsay via Internap Denis Spirin (Aug 31)