nanog mailing list archives
Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:52:32 -0400
On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
At minimum one would hope that you're heeding the warnings in the first. Another view (one that I personally hold) is that any effort you might be putting into making 6to4 work better would be better placed in deploying real IPv6 instead; and that the world would be a better place generally if all of the so-called "transition mechanisms" just went away.
I certainly feel that the lawful-intercept requirements and data retention necessary in a CGN/6to4 environment likely mean the barrier is high enough to suggest moving to IPv6, but the CPE situation is still mostly missing. - Jared
Current thread:
- Comcast's 6to4 Relays Brzozowski, John (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Doug Barton (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Jared Mauch (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Cameron Byrne (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Butch Evans (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Martin Millnert (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Geoff Huston (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Fred Baker (Apr 19)
- CIsco IOS bug info request Eric Parsonage (Apr 20)
- RE: CIsco IOS bug info request Erik Bais (Apr 20)
- Re: CIsco IOS bug info request Ingo Flaschberger (Apr 20)
- Re: CIsco IOS bug info request Randy Bush (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Doug Barton (Apr 19)