nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:01:21 +0200
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner? I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;) Scott On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling? http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/ Marc
Current thread:
- v6 Avian Carriers? Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jeff Walter (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Morris (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Steven Bellovin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Antonio Querubin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Chad Dailey (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Steven Bellovin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 03)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Robert Bonomi (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Morris (Apr 01)