nanog mailing list archives
Re: Top-posting
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:06:10 -0700
I am top-posting to show that this entire thread is retarded. I certainly could have bottom-posted, because I don't use Outlook for this list, but the point here is -- is this what the NANOG list has really become? Really? So sad. - ferg On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 12:42 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:I have used Evolution and IMAP with exchange servers in the past, so, I'm not convinced this is an entirely accurate statement.And in fact, I'm posting this message in plain-text via the OSX Mail.app connected via native Exchange protocols to an Exchange server. There's even a plug-in for Mail.app in order to make inline posting easier.
-- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Top-posting, (continued)
- Re: Top-posting Daniel Staal (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Jay Ashworth (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting bmanning (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Richard Golodner (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Bryan Fields (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Bret Palsson (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Dobbins, Roland (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Paul Ferguson (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Michael DeMan (Apr 11)
- Re: Top-posting Arnold Nipper (Apr 12)
- RE: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative? Ray Corbin (Apr 11)