nanog mailing list archives
Re: AT&T Dry Pairs?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:34:10 -0400
On Sep 30, 2010, at 6:30 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 9/30/2010 15:12, Bret Clark wrote:If the buildings are a 100ft apart, can't you just go with a wireless connection? Speeds would probably be better and no monthly fee!Wireless is not the end all solution for everything.
Understood, but for $160 you can get equipment that acts as a L2 bridge with RJ45 and PoE at 50Mb/s duplex. (UBNT Nanobridge 5, they're $79 per and do 5Ghz 802.11n MCS-15 @ 40Mhz channels). Just trying to help :) You may now shoot the off-topic messenger. - Jared
Current thread:
- AT&T Dry Pairs? Brandon Galbraith (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Ryan Shea (Sep 30)
- RE: AT&T Dry Pairs? George Bonser (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Ricky Beam (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Robert Johnson (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Bret Clark (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Seth Mattinen (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Jared Mauch (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Seth Mattinen (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Bret Clark (Sep 30)
- Re: AT&T Dry Pairs? Ryan Shea (Sep 30)