nanog mailing list archives

Re: Online games stealing your bandwidth


From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:41:16 -0500 (CDT)

From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org  Sat Sep 25 17:00:42 2010
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:01:38 +0200
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Subject: Re: Online games stealing your bandwidth
Cc: NANOG <nanog () merit edu>

On 2010-09-25 23:53, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:43:25 BST, Matthew Walster said:

Was anything ever standardised in that field? I imagine with much of
P2P traffic being (how shall I put this...) less than legal, it's of
questionable legality and the ISPs would not want to be held liable
for the content cached there?

The ISP is off the hook on that one.  17 USC 512(2) specifically carves out an ISP
safe-harbor for data that's only cached on an ISP's servers due to an end
user's request.  IANAL, so have somebody you pay for legal advice read 17 USC 512(2)
and tell you what they think.

So it that is true, if you define "news server" as a "cache", even
though you have to buy several terabytes, make that several petabytes,
to "be able to "cache" this data one along with all the network
environment to support getting data out of this "cache", the ISP is
completely in the clear even though that "cache" is the sole single
point where one can retrieve that "cached" data from even years after
the data was originally put on the network, the original is gone and
that "cache" works without anything being attached to it ? :)

There is existant _recent case law, specifically with regard to operating
a newsserver, that holds otherwise.  Of course the server operator was
blatently _advertizing_ the copyright-infringing (and more) nature of 
their content.

Several of the major ISPs who recently discontinued providing USENET did
so as a direct result of the above-mentioned case -- attorney-generals
were 'making noises' -- and the ISP chose not to risk a confrontation.





Current thread: