nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management...
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 08:41:49 -0700
On 9/21/10 8:23 AM, Matthew Topper wrote:
Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but it seems to be that that would be a huge problem when you need to change out a cable or move something. Do the benefits outweigh the headaches with this kind of setup?
I can't speak for others, but I find it's rarely necessary to move a physical cable. If I need to "move" something I do it virtually in the config. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Positively Optimistic (Sep 20)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Nick Hilliard (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Topper (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Matthew Topper (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... William Herrin (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Seth Mattinen (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Justin M. Streiner (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dylan Ebner (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Brandon Applegate (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Chuck Anderson (Sep 21)
- RE: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Tony Thornton (Sep 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Dantzig, Brian (Sep 21)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Jeff Wasilko (Sep 21)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Cisco 6509/6513 cable management... Nick Hilliard (Sep 21)