nanog mailing list archives
Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:43:26 -0400
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Reese <reese () inkworkswell com> wrote:A friend brought this to my attention: http://ipq.co/as an aside: <https://www.nic.co/> note the cert in used for the NIC's website... surely the .CO ccTLD could use a real cert?
also it's not clear that the ipq.co service is really all that robust (if that'd matter to anyone) since ipq.co's nameservers: ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;ipq.co. IN NS ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: ipq.co. 900 IN NS A.NS.ipq.co. ipq.co. 900 IN NS B.NS.ipq.co. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: A.NS.ipq.co. 900 IN A 212.110.169.105 B.NS.ipq.co. 900 IN A 212.110.169.105 are the same host/ip.
Current thread:
- Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Reese (Sep 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Jack Carrozzo (Sep 10)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Jon Lewis (Sep 10)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Leigh Porter (Sep 10)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? N. Yaakov Ziskind (Sep 11)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Scott Howard (Sep 11)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Christopher Morrow (Sep 11)
- Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else? Christopher Morrow (Sep 11)