nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 - Unique local addresses


From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:06:15 +1100


In message <3D230C80-E7CC-4B73-9E47-780DF5FA33AC () delong com>, Owen DeLong write
s:

On Oct 21, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Karl Auer wrote:

On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 10:10 +1100, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Where does the 6K come from?

AUD$4,175 is the amount - It consists of the "Associate Member
Fee" (AUD 675) and the IP Resource Application Fee (AUD 3,500)

Then AUD1180 for a /48 each year.

Er - apologies. Yes, the initial fee covers the first year's annual fee,
so it's $4175 in the first year ans $1100 in subsequent years.

The point still stands though - that's WAY too much for home users.

While for Owen such costs might be doable, for the vast majority of home
users in the AP region the only viable alternatives for internal
addressing will be PA or ULA.

This is NANOG. To the best of my knowledge, no part of the NA in NANOG
is in the APNIC service area.

ARIN pricing is significantly better at US$100/year for ALL end-user
resources, so, only the $1250 up-front fee would apply and apparently
the partial fee-waiver for that is still in effect if your previous posting
was correct.

Which is still too expensive for the home user.

Even with the lower costs that ARIN users pay, the prices are still IMHO
too high for home users to be using PI in any significant numbers.

Really? $100/year is too much? Really? I guess that depends on whether
you think addresses are worth more than coffee. ;-)

$100/year for a address block that nobody will route and requires someone
to setup the address selection rules compared to a ULA at $0 that the OS
vendors will make work well by default.

Owen
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org


Current thread: