nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 ? Unique local addresses


From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:44:40 +0800

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010, Graham Beneke wrote:

I've seen this too. Once again small providers who pretty quickly get 
caught out by collisions.

The difference is that ULA could take years or even decades to catch 
someone out with a collision. By then we'll have a huge mess.

You assume that people simply select ULA prefixes randomly and don't
start doing linear allocations from the beginning of the ULA range.




Adrian



Current thread: