nanog mailing list archives
Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6
From: Zaid Ali <zaid () zaidali com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:26:13 -0700
SO I have been turning up v6 with multiple providers now and notice that some choose /64 for numbering interfaces but one I came across use a /126. A /126 is awfully large (for interface numbering) and I am curious if there is some rationale behind using a /126 instead of a /64. Zaid
Current thread:
- Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Zaid Ali (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Scott Howard (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Nick Hilliard (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Zaid Ali (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Franck Martin (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Kevin Oberman (Oct 15)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Randy Bush (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
- Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption Brandon Kim (Oct 16)
- Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6 Mark Smith (Oct 16)
(Thread continues...)