nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer () bfk de>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:20:27 +0000
* Jack Bates:
So, the best that I can tell (still not through debating with RIR), the IPv6 routing table will see lots of bloat. Here's my reasoning so far: 1) RIR (ARIN in this case, don't know other RIR interpretations) only does initial assignments to barely cover the minimum. If you need more due to routing, you'll need to provide every pop, counts per pop, etc, to show how v6 will require more than just the minimums (full routing plan and customer counts to justify routing plan).
If you get better routing and reachability from not filtering at the /32 boundary, network operators will stop filtering at the /32 boundary. So this issue will likely go away pretty soon because you can use our initial assignment to gain the routing flexibility you need. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer () bfk de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Randy Carpenter (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Franck Martin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Randy Carpenter (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Franck Martin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Franck Martin (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Matthew Palmer (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? John Curran (Oct 27)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? Jack Bates (Oct 26)
- Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Oct 26)