nanog mailing list archives

Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?


From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:41:00 -0400

On Oct 2, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com> wrote:

That _seems_ fairly simple -- can you trace a 'continuity of ownership from
the party that they were -originally- allocatd to to the party presently using
them.  If yes, legiitmate, if no, hijacked.  With most States corporation
records on-line, tracing corporate continuity is fairly straight foruard.
As long as you recognize that a corpoation 'abadoned', 'dissolved' (or 
similar) in one state is *NOT* the 'parent' of a same-/similarly-named 
corporation established in another state.  And that "documents" surfacing
'long after' a resource-holder has 'disappeared', puporting to show a transfer
of those resources 'at the time of disappearance', are "highly suspect", and
really require confirmation from someone who can be -independantly- verified
as part of the 'old' organization at the time of the transfer.

Robert -

    You are matching nearly verbatim from ARIN's actual procedures for recognizing a transfer via merger or 
acquisition.   The problem is compounded because often the parties appear years later, don't have access to the legal 
documentation of the merger, and there is no "corporate" surviving entity to contact.   Many parties abandon these 
transfers mid-process, leaving us to wonder whether they were exactly as claimed but simply lacking needed 
documentation, or whether they were optimistic attempts to hijack. 

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

Current thread: