nanog mailing list archives
Re: wikileaks unreachable
From: Joel Esler <joel.esler () me com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:56:34 -0500
I've heard it's a DOS (not DDOS) according to twitter. Allegedly according to the person doing the DOS: Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST http://twitter.com/th3j35t3r Joel On Nov 28, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Nov 28, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:DOS is probably because they released some more stuff. "Secret US Embassy Cables" http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/DDOS according to this http://www.securityweek.com/wikileaks-under-denial-service-attack-ddos Regards Marshall-wil On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:38 PM, James Downs wrote:On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote:anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse hasReported they were under attack: http://bgg.lv/h2pmsd
Current thread:
- wikileaks unreachable Randy Bush (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andrew Mulholland (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable James Downs (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable William Pitcock (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable William Pitcock (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Andree Toonk (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Wil Schultz (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Marshall Eubanks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joel Esler (Nov 28)
- RE: wikileaks unreachable Alex Rubenstein (Nov 28)
- RE: wikileaks unreachable kmedcalf () dessus com (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Joel Esler (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Ben McGinnes (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 28)
- Re: wikileaks unreachable Patrick W. Gilmore (Nov 28)