nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blocking International DNS
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:24:46 +0530
This isnt new - there have been proposals elsewhere for a resolver based blacklist of child porn sites. There are also of course the various great firewalls of various countries. In case you'd prefer that to having to blacklist them at your end .. Doing this for trademark infringement is going to be a bit thick though. On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Joe Sniderman <joseph.sniderman () thoroquel org> wrote:
So I suppose operation of a recursor requires one to check with the government to see what names its okay to resolve.. They can have my dns recursor when they pry it from my cold dead hands. Otherwise no. /me waits for the knock at the door and the yell of "Search warrant, we hear you're running an uncensored BIND"
-- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Blocking International DNS, (continued)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Joe Sniderman (Nov 22)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Curtis Maurand (Nov 22)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Joe Abley (Nov 22)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Ken Chase (Nov 22)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 22)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Ken Chase (Nov 29)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Jeffrey Lyon (Nov 29)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Ken Chase (Nov 29)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Ken Chase (Nov 29)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Suresh Ramasubramanian (Nov 22)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Joakim Aronius (Nov 26)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Mans Nilsson (Nov 26)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Leen Besselink (Nov 26)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Bjørn Mork (Nov 26)
- Re: Blocking International DNS Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Nov 26)