nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6
From: "Job W. J. Snijders" <job () instituut net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:35:03 +0100
Hello, On 19 nov 2010, at 00:00, Nick Olsen wrote:
That's what I'm hearing. Cogent refuses to peer with HE via IPv6. So cogent IPv6 Customers currently can not hit things at HE. And they can't do anything about it. Besides 6to4 tunneling and BGP peering with HE (or native, If they can).
A few weeks ago I compared what cogent sees compared to a tata+highwinds feed. http://blog.snijders-it.nl/2010/10/cogent-as174-does-not-have-full-ipv6.html They are missing roughly 1000 prefixes. Kind regards, Job Snijders
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Jon Auer (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ray Soucy (Nov 22)
- Re: IPv6 Nick Olsen (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Nick Olsen (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Nick Olsen (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Joel Jaeggli (Nov 18)
- Re: IPv6 Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 Job W. J. Snijders (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 Jeroen Wunnink (Nov 19)
- Re: IPv6 sthaug (Nov 19)
- How many IPv6 prefixes should you have (Was: IPv6) Jeroen Massar (Nov 19)
- Re: How many IPv6 prefixes should you have (Was: IPv6) Antonio Querubin (Nov 19)
- Re: How many IPv6 prefixes should you have (Was: IPv6) Jeroen Massar (Nov 19)