nanog mailing list archives

RE: experience with equinix exchange


From: Justin Horstman <justin.horstman () gorillanation com>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:01:45 -0800

8 users
9 politics and policies

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul WALL [mailto:pauldotwall () gmail com]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 10:55 AM
To: Mehmet Akcin
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: Re: experience with equinix exchange

What are the layer 8-9 issues?

Drive Slow,
Paul Wall

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
wrote:

On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:

Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at
any of
their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
people
really love or hate it.

-shac


Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and
layer9 seem the lacking part
which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they
seem to be the largest IX

per


https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipan
tsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC

so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they
are reliable.

mehmet




Current thread: