Re: Prefix 120.29.240.0/21

[Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>]

On (2010-11-17 14:40 +0100), Fredy Kuenzler wrote:

> We asked some customers what gear they are running, and here is a
> short compilation - all these systems were affected by the BGP
> flaps:
>
> - Cisco 2821 - c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-20.T4
> - Cisco 2821 - c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T1.bin
> - Cisco ASR1002F - asr1000rp1-adventerprisek9.03.01.01.S.150-1.S1.bin
> - Juniper MX480 - junos 10.0R3.10

I think we really need community tool to test BGP implementations against
known/past bugs and unknown (fuzzied) bugs.

Simple script which has two eBGP sessions to network being tested, one
injecting routes and another receiving them should be enough.

There are quite few BGP APIs out there with pretty ready infra, some even
have test infra ready:
https://github.com/jesnault/bgp4r

I'm happy to contribute test cases if such project surfaces, but at the
moment I'm not ready to start the project. Maybe next time my network blows
up due to BGP bug, I'll find time.

-- 
  ++ytti