nanog mailing list archives
Re: flow analysis for juniper devices
From: Paolo Lucente <pl+list () pmacct net>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:12:23 +0000
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:04:36AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:59 AM, Paolo Lucente wrote:OTOH it would be nice to see one day those NetFlow v9 MAC address fields populated on higher-grade boxes, say, to facilitate analysis of public peering at internet exchanges ...This can be done with mac accounting in your platform. It may require ordering the right PIC in this case, but is easy to collect that data.
MAC accounting is not a solution, except for basic things, for at least two reasons: 1) it is coarse-grained and 2) its segregation from flow accounting prevents having all the eggs in one basket. Cheers, Paolo
Current thread:
- flow analysis for juniper devices Mehmet Akcin (Nov 13)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 13)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Paolo Lucente (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Jared Mauch (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Paolo Lucente (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Mehmet Akcin (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Paolo Lucente (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Paolo Lucente (Nov 14)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 13)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 15)
- Re: flow analysis for juniper devices Paolo Lucente (Nov 17)