nanog mailing list archives

Re: Low end, cool CPE.


From: Tim Chown <tjc () ecs soton ac uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:03:00 +0000


On 12 Nov 2010, at 12:55, Bjørn Mork wrote:

This is far too diffuse.  You'll get a "yes, we've got IPv6".

You should at least add
- IPv6 packet filtering and policy management (at least simple access
  lists) 
<snip>

The point is: We've been asking for "IPv6" for too long.  That's just
one bit in a packet header.  We need to start asking for the features we
expect, which is a lot more than that bit.

For IPv6 CPE requirements, you might want to look at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-07 and 
comment on the IETF v6ops list.   

Tim



Current thread: