nanog mailing list archives
Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 21:39:28 -0400
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Michael Ulitskiy <mulitskiy () acedsl com> wrote:
Hello, We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment - learning/labbing/experimenting/etc. We've got to the point when we're also planning to request initial ipv6 allocation from ARIN. So I wonder what ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support native ipv6 connectivity? I see Hurricane Electric tunnel broker BGP tunnel. Is there anything else? Either free or commercial?
1) see gblx/ntt/sprint/twt/vzb for transit-v6 2) tunnel inside your domain (your control, your MTU issues, your alternate pathing of tunnels vs pipe) 3) don't tunnel beyond your borders, really just don't tunnels are bad, always. -chris
Thanks, Michael
Current thread:
- ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 13)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Randy Bush (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Graham Beneke (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jeroen Massar (May 15)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Michael Ulitskiy (May 17)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Christopher Morrow (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Franck Martin (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jared Mauch (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Seth Mattinen (May 14)
- Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection Jack Carrozzo (May 14)