nanog mailing list archives

Re: Securing the BGP or controlling it?


From: deleskie () gmail com
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 22:32:51 +0000

I've worked for a couple of very large providers.  I can't speak for what the do they do today but both where very 
serious about proper filtering.  I only hope they both still do it.

-jim
------Original Message------
From: Hank Nussbacher
To: Thomas Magill
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Subject: RE: Securing the BGP or controlling it?
Sent: May 10, 2010 3:56 PM

On Mon, 10 May 2010, Thomas Magill wrote:

All of the major providers I have worked with have required proof of 
'ownership' of address space or an LoA from the registered holder of 
that space before they would allow advertisements from me, which are 
then filtered.  Is this not the norm?  I can understand if they are 
talking about an operator making a mistake, but the article seems to 
imply that anyone running BGP can bring down the Internet...  I think 
any competent provider can easily eliminate this threat from customers. 
Are there any types of penalties if an ISP is found to not be taking 
adequate precautions, other than the possible threat of losing business?

ROTFLMAO.   Competent provider?  Penalties?  Threats?  You made my day.

-Hank



Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

Current thread: