nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:49:30 -0700
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net> wrote:
Interesting statistics. It'd be interesting to know what % of newly assigned addresses are used for fraudulent and illegal purposes such as spam and scamming (how soon and how frequently will the newly assigned 1.1.1.0/8 block start appearing in block lists and spam reports?).
it's not clear that 1.1.1.0/24 is actually assigned to anyone, RIPE/APNIC were just using for some experiments. Did you actually mean 1.0.0.0/8?
Current thread:
- Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report Jeroen van Aart (Mar 23)
- Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report Christopher Morrow (Mar 23)
- Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report Jeroen van Aart (Mar 23)
- Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report Christopher Morrow (Mar 23)