nanog mailing list archives

Re: NSP-SEC


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:52:25 -0400

On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:46 PM, William Pitcock wrote:

Few people actually care about nsp-sec so what exactly are you getting at?

I might argue the "few" comment, but I think it's better not to reply to Guillaume so people who are smart enough to 
not see his posts (which would be quite a bit more than a "few") will not be force to see them.

Although I have to admit I am impressed at how quickly he has managed to piss off, alienate, and pretty much guarantee 
lasting animosity from, well, pretty much every significant person on the 'Net.  Perhaps we should lump Guillaume in 
with $HE_WHO_MUST_NOT_BE_NAMED[*]?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

[*]  Lest you receive a bazillion unicast messages CC'ed to a bazillion other people who don't care.



Current thread: