nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:04:56 -0400
I have a client here in the US, that I just discovered is using a host of private IPs that (as I understand) belong to APNIC (i.e. 1.7.154.70, 1.7.154.00-99, etc.) for their web servers.
Those aren't "private" IPs .. (in the RFC1918 sense) .. those are public IPs. They just weren't assigned until recently.
accessible it must be working for them. I'm just wondering if there is any recommendation or practice around this -- using private IP ranges from another country. Thanks.
Since they're already using NAT, it shouldn't be hard to renumber them into the appropriate RFC1918 space. Cheers, Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Current thread:
- Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Michael Holstein (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Tom Ammon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Mark Smith (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Cian Brennan (Mar 18)