nanog mailing list archives

Re: YouTube AS36561 began announcing 1.0.0.0/8


From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:06:43 -0600 (CST)

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010, Joe Greco wrote:
[something I didn't write]

If 1.0.0.0/8 has been widely used as de-facto rfc1918 for many years,
perhaps it is time to update rfc1918 to reflect this?

I seem to recall that the WIANA project "decided" to use 1.0.0.0/8 for 
the "internal" network within their meshAP project...

http://www.wiana.org/faq.php

random data point from memory.

So:

I "decided" to use 5/8 for our internal networks because I felt that it
stretched my fingers too much to go all the way over to "1" and then over
to the other end of the top row to "0."  5 seemed a happier and easier
choice.

No, but really, what was your point again?  IANA should go around making
new Class A reservations or delegations to squatters?  If so, I really
*do* need to get busy and renumbering so I have a claim on 5/8....

:-)

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.


Current thread: