nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCC releases Internet speed test tool


From: Andrew Gallo <akg1330 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:06:22 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3/12/2010 11:26 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?

We often get complaints from customers saying "I'm not getting the upload
bandwidth I'm paying for", and when we ask what they are using to determine
this, the answer is almost always either Speakeasy or Speedtest.net.

We certainly don't depend on or recommend these sites to customers (we have
our own internal tools and usually recommend FTP or iperf), but everyone who
deems themselves semi-knowledgeable seems to find their way there anyway.
Do these sites simply not have the downstream bandwidth to handle the upload
tests?  If that?s the case I'd really like to see the admins add a
disclaimer of some form directly to the site.

      Thanks,

-Scott

I'm seeing big disparity between upload and download speeds.  I had the
same thought as to the testing platform expecting asymmetrical speeds
typical of a residential link.

Why didn't they go with NDT?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkuadI0ACgkQQr/gMVyFYyT5ywCfTjlYgTs9qV3AaXHsHX3wkm15
QJYAoJoSxNzDqrdX86MoLNB+gObbhZ9/
=qGyL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: