nanog mailing list archives

RE: IPv6 enabled carriers?


From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:25:36 -0500

Hmm, apologies - I was not explicit in calling out VZW; meant to, my bad and
thanks for pointing it out!

Posting from phone, while distracted . less than ideal.

 

 

/TJ

 

From: TJ [mailto:trejrco () gmail com] 
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 17:52
To: Christopher Morrow
Subject: Re: IPv6 enabled carriers?

 

VZW's LTE HW spec's mandate IPv6 support, that's why it is relevant.

Yes, VZW - thought I made that pretty clear in my post ... (cough)also not
verizon residential(cough)

Yes, there are other carriers - none of which appear to have the level of
coverage I need in the areas I spend my time.   Or the Droid ;).  
(Although a strong IPv6 rollout might convince me ...)

/TJ

On Mar 11, 2010 5:05 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
wrote:

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM, TJ <trejrco () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, ...

how so exactly?? LTE is really just a 'last mile' tech... whether it's
v4 or v6 doesnt' seem to matter (to the fact that it's LTE)


Another nit - They are also blocking Protocol41 on their EV-DO network.

<cough>vzw not vzb</cough>


While this is a 'noble, if poorly thought out, effort' to prevent IPv6
from
impacting their cel...

there are other carriers ya know?


Current thread: