nanog mailing list archives

Re: 1.0.0.0/8 route from MERIT ?


From: Larry Blunk <ljb () merit edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:28:22 -0500


Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tomoya Yoshida <yoshida () nttv6 jp> wrote:
Thank you Geoff.

I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237 but couldn't see
of origin AS36561 for those two in database.
Even if it's an experiment and sort term, It's better to be registerd
in right origin I think. # It could be guessed but...

which databases?

morrowc@localhost:~$ whois -h rr.arin.net 1.2.3.0
% This is the ARIN Routing Registry.

% Note: this output has been filtered.

% Information related to '1.2.3.0/24AS36561'

route:          1.2.3.0/24
descr:          YouTube, Inc.
descr:          901 Cherry Ave
descr:          San Bruno, CA 94066
descr:          US
origin:         AS36561
mnt-by:         MNT-YOUTU
source:         ARIN # Filtered


morrowc@localhost:~$ whois -h rr.arin.net 1.1.1.0
% This is the ARIN Routing Registry.

% Note: this output has been filtered.

% Information related to '1.1.1.0/24AS36561'

route:          1.1.1.0/24
descr:          YouTube, Inc.
descr:          901 Cherry Ave
descr:          San Bruno, CA 94066
descr:          US
origin:         AS36561
mnt-by:         MNT-YOUTU
source:         ARIN # Filtered

These ought to then get around to other IRR-ish-things when their
propogation times hit, yes?

-Chris


    I'm not positive that this is still the case, but I believe that
there can be quite a bit of latency in mirroring due to the
way RIPE database code (which ARIN uses) works.   The
last object(s) registered are not pushed to the mirror stream until
the next object(s) are registered.    I believe RIPE regularly pushes
a dummy object in order to keep it's mirrors more regularly
synced.   I don't think that ARIN does this.   It's a bigger issue
for ARIN as their routing registry is updated less frequently
than the RIPE routing registry.

   According to our logs, the objects were not mirrored on
the RADB server until about 2.5 hours after Tomoya posted
his email (the objects were picked up from the ARIN
mirror at 05:37:42 -0500 (EST)  March 2).



--Larry



When RPKI comes, is it no problem??

       -tomoya


On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:17:45 +1100
Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net> wrote:

|Hi,
|
|As I noted in the previous note quoted below, APNIC are undertaking a second experiment with these two /24 routes 
originated by AS 36561. These two /24s appear to be the major attractors in the 1.0.0.0/8 space. YouTube have 
generously provided assistance for this second experiment, and we are very grateful for their help!
|
|  Geoff Huston
|  APNIC
|
|
|
|
|On 02/03/2010, at 6:59 PM, Tomoya Yoshida wrote:
|
|> Are these from youtube also?
|>
|> 1.1.1.0/24         *[BGP/170] 07:04:22, MED 0, localpref 100
|>                      AS path: 2914 3356 36561 I
|> 1.2.3.0/24         *[BGP/170] 07:01:21, MED 0, localpref 100
|>                      AS path: 2914 3356 36561 I
|>
|>      tomoya
|>
|>
|> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:34:02 +1100
|> Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net> wrote:
|>
|> |
|> |On 25/02/2010, at 6:13 AM, Alex H. Ryu wrote:
|> |
|> |>
|> |> Today I jumped into one of our routers, and I found that 1.0.0.0/8 is
|> |> announced from AS237, which is MERIT.
|> |>
|> |>
|> |>    Network            Next Hop        Metric LocPrf Weight Path
|> |> *>  1.0.0.0/8          4.59.200.5      0      60     0      (65001
|> |> 65105) 3356 7018 237 i
|> |>
|> |> Is this supposed to be?
|> |> I thought 1.0.0.0/8 is allocated to APNIC.
|> |
|> |Yes, this is supposed to be. This is one of a number of planned experiments in advertising all and selected parts 
of 1/8 in the coming weeks.
|> |
|> |Geoff Huston
|> |APNIC
|>
|> --
|> Tomoya Yoshida <yoshida () nttv6 jp>
|>

--
Tomoya Yoshida <yoshida () nttv6 jp>







Current thread: