nanog mailing list archives

RE: CRS-3


From: "Arjan van der Oest" <arjan.van.der.oest () worldmax nl>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:58:47 +0100

Cisco did 100GE before, based upon the 802.3ba: http://www.10gea.org/100-ge-router-cisco-comcast.htm

The 'wow' factor in this is news might be that these new linecards are nonblocking and will eventually support the 
final standard without hardware changes.

Arjan

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patrick () ianai net]
Sent: Tue 3/9/2010 11:02 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: CRS-3
 
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:

The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?"

Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco.

Then why bother hyping at all?

Anyone who needs even a significant fraction of 322 Tbps is not going to ignore competitors.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

Internet communications are not secure; therefore, the integrity of this e-mail cannot be guaranteed following 
transmission on the Internet. This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please notify the sender and erase this e-mail. Use of this e-mail by any person other than the addressee is 
strictly forbidden. This e-mail is believed to be free of any virus that might adversely affect the addressee's 
computer system; however, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. All the 
preceding disclaimers also apply to any possible attachments to this e-mail.


Current thread: