Re: CRS-3

["Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>]

On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:

> LOL! Wow that is a pretty sad comment......
>
> But back to the CRS-3, just wow!!!

Wow what?

Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?

If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per slot, and pre-release equipment is in use in 
some networks already.

The only "wow" here is "wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they are?"

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


> > Subject: RE: CRS-3
> > Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:54:16 -0500
> > From: dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com
> > To: nanog () nanog org
> >
> > From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfeeny () mac com] 
> > > So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
> > >
> > > http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
> > >
> > >
> > > - Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
> > > - Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minutes
> > >
> > > If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
> > >
> > > Brian
> >
> > The article about this in the tech section on CNN
> > already has comments in it like "Oh, well Cisco
> > owns Linksys and I have a Linksys router so will
> > my ISP be updating me to the CRS-3 so I can
> > download at those speeds?"  LOL
>