nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space - the lie
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 03:39:26 -0500
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:07:47 +0800, Owen DeLong said:
Interesting way of thinking about it. I suspect that rather than pay your premium prices, the customers you just degraded in order to charge them more for the service they had will look to your competitors for better service.
I suspect that in many areas, the incumbent monopoly/duopoly has done a sufficiently good job of lowering customer expectations to do this. They've already been marketing what should be baseline service as "premium" for years already, and I'm not seeing much motivation for them to change.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Newton (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Dan White (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Cameron Byrne (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Andrews (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Saku Ytti (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Owen DeLong (Mar 06)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space - the lie Mark Newton (Mar 07)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Steve Bertrand (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 04)