nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook?
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:50:46 -0600
On 3/4/2010 3:14 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:35:47 EST, Dean Anderson said:<lots of whining about "it's not a DDoS/spam"> elided.My To: list: To: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Your To: list: To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu, Shon Elliott <shon () unwiredbb com>, Adam Stasiniewicz <adam () adamstas com>, Reed Loden <reed () reedloden com>, Noel Butler <noel.butler () ausics net>, jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>, Matthew Dodd <mdodd () doddserver com>, Benjamin Billon<bbillon-ml () splio fr>, Bob Poortinga <bobp+nanog () webster tsc com>, Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>, Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>, "Tomas L. Byrnes" <tomb () byrneit net>, Michelle Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>, Jay Hennigan <jay () west net>, Larry Sheldon<LarrySheldon () cox net> Cc: nanog () nanog org, Betty Burke <bburke () merit edu> And you *know* the cc: to nanog won't work. Sending mail to places you *know* don't want it is the trademark of a spammer. No wonder you whine so much about "it's not a DDoS/spam".
Now I am really confused. When I said "Reply to all" ("reply to list" didn't light, because it turns out the list name was not in the bunch any place, so I deleted all the CC:s and added a "To: ". My usual practice is to delete all the To:s and Cc:s, leaving only the CC: nanog () nanog org which seems to work fine. It would be nice if people would just reply to the list and leave all the CC;s from prior list traffic off.
Congrats. Only one or two people manage to exceed my legendary patience and earn a personal entry in my procmailrc pointing to /dev/null. Have a nice day.
I'm surprised that I haven't been admonished--I have never been allowed to talk about operational stuff this long before. -- "Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals. Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook?, (continued)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? jim deleskie (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? jim deleskie (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Larry Sheldon (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Larry Sheldon (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Michael Holstein (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? jim deleskie (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Jay Hennigan (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Daniel Staal (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Larry Sheldon (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Larry Sheldon (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Michael Holstein (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Shon Elliott (Mar 04)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Graeme Fowler (Mar 05)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Michael Holstein (Mar 05)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? David E. Smith (Mar 05)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Graeme Fowler (Mar 05)
- 5xx responses and sender lists (was facebook...) Jay Hennigan (Mar 05)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Graeme Fowler (Mar 05)
- Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook? Rich Kulawiec (Mar 05)