Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group]

[David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>]

Well, actually, ICANN was in Geneva specifically for the meeting, but we weren't allowed into the room.  Quite 
annoying, actually.

Regards,
-drc

On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> There were a few representatives of the Internet community at the
> meeting.  All five RIRs were represented, as was ISOC.  The notable
> absence was ICANN.  Of course, this sample is by no means
> representative of the entire community, but it's more than "None."
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Martin Hannigan
> <martin () theicelandguy com> wrote:
> > None.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/11/10, Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net> wrote:
> > > What NANOG contributors, if any, are invited by a government, to join
> > > their national delegation to the initial meeting of the ITU's IPv6
> > > Group in Geneva next week?
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my mobile device
> >
> > Martin Hannigan                               martin () theicelandguy com
> > p: +16178216079
> > Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants