nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:03:12 -0500
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:
1. Why don't providers use /31 addresses for P2P links? This works fine per rfc 3021 but nobody seems to believe it or use it. Are there any major manufacturers out there that do not support it?
Some vendors inconsistently support these on ethernet-framed interfaces and randomly break their code [again]. The one I am aware of is located on Tasman, and YMMV varies depending on what line of business synced code from whom and when. Nothing like upgrading a minor patch revision of software and losing your infrastructure link.... - Jared
Current thread:
- IP4 Space Thomas Magill (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Jared Mauch (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Seth Mattinen (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- RE: IP4 Space Thomas Magill (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 04)