nanog mailing list archives
Re: E1200i vs EX8200 in Large Deployment
From: itservices88 <itservices88 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:17:09 -0700
This might be interesting to you: http://www.force10networks.com/new_ethernet_economics/player/?rndr=2 On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Tom <bifrost () minions com> wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, Adam LaFountain wrote:If anyone out there has any pro/con experience with the Force10 E1200i or S50 in a large environment I'd really appreciate your thoughts.Those are totally different animals, they don't even run the same code :) E1200 is a large chassis switch, S50N/V are 1U stackables. One can actually do (tables/mpls) IP routing, one can't; Basically one is decent for core, one for server agg. I'm comparing them against the Juniper EX8200 and EX4200 respectively andcurious about hardware/software stability on both brands.It really depends on what you're looking for... The EX series is a great L2/L3 switch, but likely you'd end up wanting MX in core if you're going the Juniper direction. IMHO Juniper is faster and more responsive in releasing updates if that matters. I've seen Juniper eat F10's lunch more than once recently, so you should probably figure out what you want first before you get in too deep :) -Tom
Current thread:
- E1200i vs EX8200 in Large Deployment Adam LaFountain (Jun 03)
- Re: E1200i vs EX8200 in Large Deployment Tom (Jun 03)
- Re: E1200i vs EX8200 in Large Deployment itservices88 (Jun 05)
- Re: E1200i vs EX8200 in Large Deployment Tom (Jun 03)