nanog mailing list archives
Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:21:37 +0800
The official answer: commodity hardware doesn't handle all the features needed at "line rate". The (more often than not) unofficial answer: using a custom platform raises the entry barrier for cloning/abuse/etc. It's a bit hard to run your appliance MIPS software on an off-the-shelf PC; but it (used) to be possible to run PIX software on a PC (and in a VM too, IIRC.) Fun times, Adrian On Sun, Jul 25, 2010, Tarig Yassin wrote:
Dear all Greetings I'm wondering why the software based router is not preferable in business even if they have high featured Processers, and high capcity of memory. What is the main deferent between Appliance router and Software based routers? thank you all in adavance. -- Tarig Y. Adam _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-- - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support - - $24/pm+GST entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
Current thread:
- Appliance Vs Software based routers Tarig Yassin (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Jack Bates (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Owen DeLong (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Adrian Chadd (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Laurens Vets (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 25)
- RE: Appliance Vs Software based routers Nathan Eisenberg (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers todd glassey (Jul 25)
- RE: Appliance Vs Software based routers Nathan Eisenberg (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers todd glassey (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers William Herrin (Jul 25)
- Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers Jack Bates (Jul 25)