Re: I went so you don't have to -- ICANN Bruxelles pour les nuls

[William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>]

On 7/2/10 10:00 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> There are a few people who have some passing interest in ICANN so I will inflict upon the list my few paragraph summary 
> of things that matter.
I thank you!  And I'm sure others here do too....


> The ISPSG (that's the ISP -- Internet.Service.Providers Stakeholders Group) continued to drift into senility and decay 
> with ISPs still staffing ICANN issue advocacy out of their IP (Intellectual Property) in-house counsels rather than their IP
> (4&6&BGP&tone&stuff) operational sides, so wakeful behavior remains confined to the ASO input to ICANN, and limited to 
> the last v4 /8s known to LGBT and other persons.
Yeah, well -- I'd burned out after just 3 meetings forming ICANN, was truly
unhappy about the treatment of Auerbach, and there's really not anything in the
budget.  I don't know how you do it.


> This exchange:
>
> > On 2 Jul 2010, at 13:34, Bret Clark wrote:
> >
> > > 28.8k Modem users...
> >
> > AT&T iPhone users... the new 14.4 modem of the internet.
>
> Had me laughing!
Me, too.